Assessment and modernization
When the business is growing but technology is lagging behind, the first step is not buying more tools—it is understanding what slows operations and what to modernize first.
It is unclear what should be modernized first or what impact it would have.
Capability illustration
Scenarios
Signals that this service may be the right starting point.
Assessment
Items that typically enter initial assessment scope.
Before and after
The outcome is an actionable plan, not a generic deck. Assessment depth is calibrated to the size and maturity of your operation.
Fit
Scope
Capabilities
Deliverables
Methodology
We align on which decisions the assessment should enable and what is out of scope to avoid vague expectations.
Interviews, document review, and walkthroughs of critical processes with people who run daily operations.
We translate findings into gaps with impact, effort, and dependencies to sequence interventions.
We define phases, expected deliverables, and progress criteria leadership and operations can track.
We present results, answer questions, and clarify how to resume execution with defined ownership.
FAQ
It depends on operation size and how many processes or systems are in scope. For an SME with one or two critical fronts, it usually takes two to four weeks combining interviews, document review, and prioritization workshops. Multiple sites or in-flight projects extend the calendar so depth is not sacrificed. We set timelines at kickoff based on what you actually need to decide.
It is not required. We work with companies that have a small IT function, an external provider, or a technical point of contact inside operations. What matters is access to people who know the processes and whoever manages systems or active contracts. If there is no internal owner, we help identify who should take ownership during and after the assessment so the roadmap does not sit unused.
The assessment delivers clarity, priorities, and a roadmap; implementation is quoted by phase based on what we agree to execute. Separating both stages avoids mixing recommendations with sales pressure for a specific product. Many clients continue with us on the first roadmap phase, but the output also helps you bid work or reorganize internal efforts with defined criteria.
Yes, and it is a common scenario. We review original scope, actual deliverables, technical or management blockers, and what value can still be recovered without starting from scratch. The goal is not to blame a previous vendor but to decide whether to resume, reshape, or close out cleanly. That decision is documented with criteria leadership can act on.
We are based in Bogotá and serve companies across Colombia with remote work and targeted on-site visits when the assessment requires them. For distributed operations we combine virtual interviews with on-site walkthroughs at critical sites. We agree this in initial scope to optimize client team time without losing touch with people who run the process daily.
We do not require perfect documentation; we start with what exists: functional org view, system list, active contracts, diagrams if available, and access to area owners. If little is written down, discovery relies more on interviews. Before kickoff we send a minimal checklist so the start is not delayed by unnecessary bureaucracy.
We connect assessment with real execution capacity across automation, enterprise systems, development, and IT operations. We do not deliver slides disconnected from what can be implemented in a Colombian SME with constrained budget and timelines. Every recommendation is filtered by priority, dependency, and effort so leadership can decide realistically.
Cost depends on the breadth of the review. Assessing one process is very different from reviewing infrastructure, systems, data, cybersecurity, and operations across multiple locations. The first step is to define which decisions the assessment must support, which areas need to participate, and what evidence is available so a reasonable scope and estimate can be established.
Yes. That situation usually requires understanding where data is duplicated, which activities depend on manual work, which tools are genuinely critical, and where access or continuity risks exist. The objective is not to eliminate Excel automatically, but to determine what should remain, be integrated, automated, or replaced.
Yes. A useful roadmap should start with business problems, dependencies, and priorities rather than a product list. Some actions may require new tools, while others may be addressed by configuring existing systems better, integrating platforms, improving data, documenting processes, or correcting controls.
They can be included in the same assessment when the problem requires a cross-functional view. Not every assessment needs the same depth in every domain. The scope should focus on areas that affect real decisions and conclude with priorities, dependencies, and next steps that management can understand.
It depends on the agreed scope, but the outcome should turn findings into decisions rather than only a technical list. It can include current state, risks, opportunities, dependencies, and a roadmap. Issues can be organized by risk, impact, effort, and urgency to determine what should be addressed first and what can wait.
It depends on scope, information availability, number of business areas, and environment complexity. A focused review can be completed much faster than an assessment covering multiple locations, systems, infrastructure, and security. The decisions the assessment must support and the evidence that needs review should be defined before committing to a duration.
Not every assessment requires administrative access on the first day. Work can begin with interviews, inventories, documentation, diagrams, reports, and existing evidence. When direct system or configuration review is required, access should be provided using the minimum level necessary and through controlled mechanisms.
It can identify duplicated tools, unused capacity, expensive dependencies, or licenses that deserve review, although the objective should not be to promise a specific cost reduction. Each expense should be connected to the function it performs and the risk of changing it before recommending removal or consolidation.
Yes, when the recommendations fall within Orquitech's capabilities and a new implementation scope is agreed. Separating assessment from execution allows the company to understand priorities first and then decide which initiatives should be delivered internally, by Orquitech, or by other providers.
Technologies
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Azure
Power Platform
Entra ID
SharePoint
Microsoft Teams
Power BIExperience
Technology projects stall, lose focus, or never leave an operable result.
Tell us what is slowing your operation and we will propose an assessment scoped to what you need to decide.
Chat on WhatsAppContact
Reach our team on the channel you prefer. Tell us what you want to improve and we will guide the next step.
Message us directly to discuss your requirement or project.
Open WhatsAppCall our team during regular business hours.
+57 322 810 0001
Call nowSend us the details of your question or project.
info@orqui.tech
Send emailCarrera 62 #98B-22, Office 302A, Bogotá, Colombia
Get directions