Enterprise systems
When sales, operations, and finance do not share the same information, the issue is rarely software alone—you need to connect processes, data, and tools with discipline.
Business information and processes are not connected.
Capability illustration
Scenarios
Signals that this service may be the right starting point.
Assessment
Items that typically enter initial assessment scope.
Before and after
We select platform and scope based on your operation, not a rigid catalog. Azure and Microsoft 365 enable the solution when they fit the context.
Fit
Scope
Capabilities
Deliverables
Methodology
We align business flows and master data before configuring modules or building screens.
We define architecture, integrations, permissions, and success criteria with key stakeholders.
We deliver modules or features in short cycles with real user testing.
We move critical data with validations, planned rollback, and agreed windows.
We train, monitor early incidents, and adjust before closing out.
FAQ
We work with configuration of established platforms, low-code extensions, and custom development when the process requires it. We do not promise a generic ERP that solves everything without defined scope. We start with modules or processes with the highest impact—sales, operations, inventory, or service—and expand in phases based on adoption and budget.
It is a frequent enabler—identity, collaboration, SharePoint, Teams, and Power Platform can support light CRM, portals, or operational flows. We do not present it as an automatic substitute for a full management system. We assess what can live in M365 and what needs another platform or specific development to avoid awkward fits.
Yes, when there are reasonable APIs, connectors, or exchange points. We map which data must flow, how often, and who owns each system. If integration is fragile or costly, we also propose simplifying the process before building complex bridges. The goal is reliable operation, not a pretty diagram.
A scoped portal or focused CRM can take weeks; a broader rollout with migrations and integrations is measured in months. We define phases with visible deliverables so value is not deferred to the end. Timeline depends on data quality, client team availability, and integration complexity.
Yes, with a controlled approach: field mapping, prior cleanup, test-environment runs, and validation with key users before cutover. We avoid big-bang migrations without a rollback plan. If historical data is heavily degraded, we agree what migrates, what is archived, and what is recaptured.
We can provide stabilization, evolutionary improvements, and administration under separate service agreements. We deliver documentation so an internal team or local provider can operate. Post-go-live support is sized by system criticality and client team maturity.
Yes, it is our usual context—growing businesses that need serious systems without large-corporate bureaucracy. We adjust scope, phases, and platform to actual business size. We prefer projects with an internal sponsor who can decide and validate processes with us.
It depends on users, modules, processes, data migration, integrations, customization, and required support. A CRM implementation focused on sales follow-up can be much smaller than a system connecting several departments. The estimate should start with actual processes and data rather than only the number of licenses.
A CRM typically organizes customer relationships, opportunities, and follow-up. An ERP connects broader operational and administrative processes. A custom application can make sense when a differentiated workflow is not handled well by standard products. Before selecting a solution, the process and existing technology should be reviewed.
Yes. A portal can centralize requests, documents, status information, approvals, or information exchange when identity, permissions, and data sources are properly defined. It can be integrated with existing systems rather than becoming another isolated application.
Yes, when those tools fit the use case. They can support collaboration, documents, forms, applications, and automation, but the solution must consider permissions, governance, licensing, and maintenance. Not every process needs to be built on the same platform.
Yes, when the products involved provide APIs, connectors, or reliable data-exchange methods. Identifiers, business rules, refresh frequency, and error handling should be reviewed first. If a legacy system has limitations, integration can be designed in phases rather than automatically replacing it.
The sources, fields, duplicates, formats, and business rules that must be preserved are identified first. The information is then cleaned and transformed before being loaded and validated in the new system. Moving all historical data without reviewing its quality can transfer old problems into a new platform.
In many cases yes, through preparation, testing, controlled migrations, and a planned transition. The level of disruption depends on existing dependencies and whether both systems can operate temporarily in parallel. The transition plan should clearly define when and under what conditions the new environment becomes authoritative.
The implementation should reflect real processes, reduce work instead of duplicating it, and define ownership for each type of data. Training, user testing, and decisions about required information are also important. Adoption is not solved simply by installing the platform.
Ownership should normally belong to the business area that understands and uses the information, even when IT administers the platform. Defining data owners helps resolve inconsistencies, permissions, quality, and rule changes. Without clear ownership, different areas may end up using different definitions for the same information.
Technologies
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Azure
SharePoint
Microsoft Teams
Entra ID
Power Apps
Power Automate
Power PlatformExperience
Day-to-day operations and customer service depend on fragmented processes.
Tell us which system is missing or unused and we will assess CRM, management, or portal scope realistically.
Chat on WhatsAppContact
Reach our team on the channel you prefer. Tell us what you want to improve and we will guide the next step.
Message us directly to discuss your requirement or project.
Open WhatsAppCall our team during regular business hours.
+57 322 810 0001
Call nowSend us the details of your question or project.
info@orqui.tech
Send emailCarrera 62 #98B-22, Office 302A, Bogotá, Colombia
Get directions