Frequent interruptions
- What usually happens
- Aging servers or unstable networks cause outages that stop sales, plant, or customer service.
- What we would examine
- Inventory, capacity, monitoring, single points of failure, and supplier dependencies.
Infrastructure and connectivity
When systems fail, remote access is unreliable, or cloud grew without a clear architecture, the whole operation feels it. We organize inventory, dependencies, and an executable modernization path.
Infrastructure is not stable, secure, or easy to operate.
Capability illustration
Scenarios
Signals that this service may be the right starting point.
Assessment
Items that typically enter initial assessment scope.
Hybrid architecture
Not everything must move to the cloud. We define what stays local, what moves, and in what order—with visible cost and operations.
Practical continuity
A backup without a restoration test is a fragile promise. We prioritize recovery, owners, and usable documentation.
Before and after
We do not promise total uptime or automatic savings from moving to the cloud; design responds to risk and real operations.
Fit
Scope
Capabilities
Deliverables
Methodology
We document servers, cloud, networks, identity, and suppliers with their dependencies.
We prioritize outages, backups, single points of failure, and hard-to-explain costs.
We propose what stays local, what moves to cloud, and how access stays secure.
We define sequence, testing, change windows, and handover owners.
We leave runbooks, basic monitoring, and clear supplier coordination.
FAQ
No. We evaluate what moving improves and what is more stable or economical to keep on-site. The decision depends on applications, latency, compliance, cost, and the team's ability to operate. A hybrid model with clear architecture is often better. We avoid full migrations for fashion when operational risk does not justify them.
Yes. We start from the real inventory, available configurations, and interviews with people who operate today. We coordinate with existing suppliers when scope includes it. The goal is to understand dependencies and risks—not to replace suppliers by default. If documentation is missing, we rebuild it as part of the assessment.
We review system criticality, latency needs, exit costs, hardware or plant dependencies, and internal operating capacity. We also consider backups, security, and supportability. With that we propose a target architecture and sequence. The recommendation is documented with assumptions and alternatives.
Yes—we assess links, VPN or secure access, DNS, identity, and wireless coverage as needed. We propose improvements proportional to real hybrid-team and multi-site use. We test with representative users before closing the change. Coverage hours and support are defined by agreement, not as a generic promise.
We verify what is backed up, how often, where it is stored, and whether anyone has restored successfully recently. We prioritize critical systems and document recovery order. When possible, we coordinate a controlled restoration test. Without that evidence, we treat backup as an open risk—not assured continuity.
Yes. We work with Microsoft environments, Linux, and virtualization platforms such as Proxmox, VMware, or Hyper-V, plus public cloud when relevant. We choose based on existing inventory and the client's operating capacity. We do not force a single vendor. Architecture is documented so another team can continue it.
We split the change into phases with agreed windows, prior testing, and a rollback plan if something fails. We identify dependencies so critical pieces are not moved blindly. We communicate to users what changes and when. Go-live includes documentary handover and a short stabilization period—we do not close the project at first power-on.
It depends on the current inventory, number of locations, capacity, availability requirements, migrations, and security controls. Some companies need targeted corrections while others require phased modernization. An initial assessment helps separate configuration issues from genuine investment needs in hardware, cloud, or connectivity.
Yes, depending on the environment and project scope. The review can include hosts, virtual machines, storage, services, backups, dependencies, and capacity. The appropriate platform depends on technical requirements, support, licensing, and continuity rather than preference for one technology.
Yes. Connectivity should be reviewed as a system that includes topology, access, segmentation, coverage, dependencies, and security. When there are multiple locations or remote users, routing, authentication, and continuity also need to be considered so a connectivity problem is not solved by creating a security problem.
Yes, when the scope requires architecture, migration, configuration, or integration of those services. Before moving workloads or data, identity, dependencies, connectivity, backup, operating costs, and recovery should be reviewed. Cloud adoption does not automatically mean moving everything away from local infrastructure.
In some cases yes, but capacity, compatibility, storage, support, and risk must be validated. Virtualization can make use of existing infrastructure when conditions are appropriate. When hardware creates a significant failure point or can no longer support the required workload, the recommendation should reflect that rather than artificially extending its life.
The decision depends on applications, connectivity, performance, availability, security, costs, support, and physical dependencies. Some workloads fit the cloud well, others are better kept locally, and many companies use a combination. The objective should be to choose the appropriate architecture for each service rather than move everything to one platform because of a trend.
Not necessarily. The disruption depends on applications, data, architecture, and migration method. Inventory, testing, and a transition plan can reduce impact, but any required downtime should be identified and communicated before the change rather than promising zero downtime without evidence.
A backup preserves a copy of information or systems. Disaster recovery defines how operations are restored after disruption, including priorities, infrastructure, access, dependencies, responsibilities, and expected timelines. Backups are necessary in many scenarios, but they do not by themselves constitute a recovery plan.
RPO expresses how much data loss an organization can tolerate in a recovery scenario, while RTO expresses how long a service can remain unavailable. Defining these objectives helps select backup, redundancy, and recovery approaches according to actual business needs.
Technologies

Experience
Infrastructure is unstable, hard to operate, or poorly prepared to grow.
We review servers, cloud, networks, and continuity with a practical plan, without promising total uptime.
Talk about cloud, networks, or serversContact
Reach our team on the channel you prefer. Tell us what you want to improve and we will guide the next step.
Message us directly to discuss your requirement or project.
Open WhatsAppCall our team during regular business hours.
+57 322 810 0001
Call nowSend us the details of your question or project.
info@orqui.tech
Send emailCarrera 62 #98B-22, Office 302A, Bogotá, Colombia
Get directions