Cybersecurity, continuity, and compliance

With essentials: individual accounts instead of shared ones, multifactor authentication on critical systems, privilege review, and backups with at least one restoration test. Then organize incident roles and basic evidence. We avoid buying new tools if current ones are not configured. The starting point is real operational risk—not a generic product list.

No. Orquitech has experience assessing and implementing ISO 27001 controls, but is not a certification body and does not issue certificates. We help improve controls, organize evidence, and prepare the organization if it later pursues a formal audit with an independent certifier. That distinction stays explicit in proposals and deliverables.

We inventory privileged accounts, active users, and permissions on agreed systems. We compare them with current roles and departures. We propose corrections, stronger authentication where missing, and a simple joiners-movers-leavers process. The deliverable includes findings and a prioritized backlog—not only a generic best-practice list.

Backup is the copy of data or systems. Business continuity defines which services recover first, who decides, how communication works, and what alternatives exist while restoration runs. Without priorities and roles, a technical backup does not guarantee operations return. We address both levels according to scope.

Yes. We define roles, escalation channels, severity criteria, and initial containment and communication steps. The plan aligns with the company's real systems and suppliers. We also recommend short exercises so the document is usable. We do not promise total incident prevention.

Almost never. First we use what you already have—identity, email, backups, and monitoring. We propose tool changes only when a clear gap cannot be closed with configuration and process. Cost and operating capacity matter as much as technical function. Ethical hacking or other specialized tests are scoped separately when needed.

We combine business impact, ease of exploitation, current exposure, and remediation effort. Findings are ordered into a phased roadmap with suggested owners. We prioritize controls that reduce real risk over cosmetic improvements. Prioritization is reviewed with the company to align budget and capacity.

It depends on users, systems, locations, cloud services, existing controls, and the depth of the review. An access and configuration assessment has a different scope from offensive technical testing or compliance-control preparation. The first step is to define which risks or decisions the assessment needs to address.